Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 +99%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
1920
112
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU106
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy