Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
15104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +1824%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
1792
Shading Units
16896
112
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
1000W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GB100
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
208 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy