Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +336%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
475W
550 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vega 20
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy