Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +2433%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
19456
112
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
153 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy