Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +582%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy