Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +94%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy