Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +26%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy