Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD FirePro S9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9100 +41%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy