Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD FirePro S9100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +33%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2816
160
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
580W
550 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Hawaii
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy