Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +45%
5.069 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy