Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +149%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
2816
Shading Units
4480
176
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GA100
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy