Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 235W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV380
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy