Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +725%
5.069 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cayman
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy