Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +1118%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
128
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
135W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G92
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy