Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1076MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +19%
6.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2816
176
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.3 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
189.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.060 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GM200
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GM200-310-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy