Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (215W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080 +98%
10.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
2816
Shading Units
2944
176
TMUs
184
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
215W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU104
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy