Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA P104 101

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA P104 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 256.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
P104 101 +69%
8.617 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2816
Shading Units
2560
176
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GP104
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy