Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon 550

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +318%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Lexa
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy