CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
VS
AMD FirePro S9150
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 400W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1967MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
+198%
15.11 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
VS
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1967 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
60
2816
Shading Units
3840
176
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.8 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
472.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.21 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
944.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
235W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD FirePro S9150
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro S9150
3
ATI Radeon HD 3470 vs AMD FirePro S9150
4
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD FirePro S9150
5
AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
6
AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX
7
Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FirePro S9150
8
AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
9
AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
10
AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy