Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +807%
45.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
5120
176
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
160
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 31
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy