Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +16268%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV620
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy