Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +53%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
28
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy