Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +182%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
20
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cayman
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy