Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +159%
5.238 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1440
176
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cypress
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy