Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +1847%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
112
176
TMUs
28
64
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G80
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy