Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +371%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750
1.111 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1111 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GM107
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
GM107-300-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy