Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +97%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GA100
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy