Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +2642%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
693 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.18GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
120
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.368 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
191.0 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV635
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy