Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +67%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 24
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy