Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +351%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
5120
176
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
335W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy