Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

AMD FirePro S9170 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 4.256GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1550 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 275W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.256GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.808 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.808 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
27W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV516
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy