Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T1000

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +109%
5.238 TFLOPS
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
896
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy