Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T400

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +378%
5.238 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
384
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy