Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +197%
7.987 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
DG2-128
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy