Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +5485%
7.987 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV630
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy