Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV516
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy