Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +24859%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV620
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy