Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +296%
7.987 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1440
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Cypress
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy