Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +2869%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
640MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
28
64
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
G80
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy