Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +17648%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GT218
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy