AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+180%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU117
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.0
Shader Model
6.6
