Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +80%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU116
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy