Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (185W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +5%
7.987 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
185W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
TU106
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy