Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)
3760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +663%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2
1.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
4096
Shading Units
336
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
160W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GF114
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy