AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

VS

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

1152 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock1710MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (215W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

FirePro S9300 X2

7.987 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2080 +26%

10.07 TFLOPS

FirePro S9300 X2

VS

GeForce RTX 2080

Graphics Card

Mar 2016

Release Date

Sep 2018

FirePro

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1515 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1710 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

46

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2944

256

TMUs

184

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

368

-

RT Cores

46

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

109.4 GPixel/s

249.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

314.6 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

20.14 TFLOPS

7.987 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.07 TFLOPS

499.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

314.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin

GPU Name

TU104

Capsaicin XT

GPU Variant

TU104-400A-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

300W

TDP

215W

700 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

2

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

4

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo

5

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

6

AMD Radeon HD 6770 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

7

Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

8

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107

9

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc A770

10

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD