Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +69%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
AD107
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy