Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +4059%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
45W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV630
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy