Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 8950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +140%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8950 OEM
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2013
FirePro
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
200W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy