Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (230W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +34%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
56
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Vega 10
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
230W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy