Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.26GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +8488%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
G84
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy